In today’s data-driven world, managing cloud and big data costs has become one of the thorniest challenges for technology leaders. As enterprises shift their data workloads to the cloud and embrace modern data platforms with petabyte-scale data lakes, distributed computing frameworks like Spark, and serverless query engines, they often discover an uncomfortable truth: cloud costs can rapidly spiral and increase substantially.
These trends have facilitated the rise of data centric observability tools. Data platform observability tools are increasingly recognized as effective solutions for managing costs.They monitor the utilization of compute clusters, identify opportunities to optimize workloads, and deliver actionable alerts and comprehensive reports.
While these data-centric tools observability tools are necessary, they may not be entirely ideal or sufficient for sustainable cost control in big data environments. In fact, many organizations that rely solely on observability find themselves trapped in a reactive loop: watching cloud bills rise and responding only after the damage is done.
Let’s explore why this happens and what it takes to move beyond observability toward true cost management in big data.
In recent times, data platform observability tools are slowly becoming a staple in any modern engineering stack. Examples of players in this space include platforms like Chaos Genius and Unravel Data, which specialize in analyzing big data environments. These tools provide visibility into pipeline performance, cost inefficiencies, and infrastructure bottlenecks—helping teams track the health of workloads, optimize resource usage, and monitor system behavior more effectively.
For operations teams, observability provides invaluable insights: when a job is failing,when a pipeline is under performing, when a cluster is overloaded. Many observability platforms also allow teams to visualize cloud costs at a high level—which storage buckets are growing fastest, which compute resources are most utilized, and so on.
This is useful—but not enough. Because observability, at its core, is about describing what is happening, not about guiding what should happen. And that’s a critical distinction when it comes to cost control.
Here’s a typical scenario: a data engineering team notices that their cloud bill has spiked dramatically this month. They check their observability dashboards and see that one oftheir nightly Spark ETL jobs has started consuming far more compute than before. They dig into logs and metrics and eventually discover that a new data source was added—but the pipeline wasn’t optimized to handle it, causing a massive shuffle and a 5x increase in processing cost.
This is a story of reactive firefighting. By the time the team noticed the issue, the cloud provider had already billed them for the excess usage. No amount of beautiful Grafana dashboards can turn back the clock on that bill.
This is the fundamental limitation of using observability alone for cost control.Observability helps you detect problems after they occur. But big data cost optimization requires a proactive mindset:
Observability tools aren’t designed to answer these questions. They lack the predictive intelligence and deep data workload understanding required to drive proactive costcontrol.
.png)
Another key challenge is that many big data cost drivers are invisible to traditional observability tools. Metrics like CPU usage and memory consumption tell you what resources were consumed, but they rarely tell you why they were consumed. Many of the most significant and costly inefficiencies in big data environments stem from the way data itself is structured and accessed. Poorly optimized file formats, such as using CSV instead of Parquet, can drastically increase the amount of data read and processed.
True cost optimization requires deep introspection into data workloads:
This level of insight simply isn’t part of what observability tools were built to provide.
Yeedu is built from the ground up to ensure cost-efficient execution of data workloads not just monitor them. While traditional platforms focus on through put and scale, Yeedu's architecture is purpose-designed to minimize waste and maximize performance without driving up cloud bills.
At the heart of Yeedu is its Turbo Engine, which dramatically accelerates CPU-bound data jobs by leveraging vectorized query execution, columnar processing, and modern processor capabilities. This allows enterprises to execute data workloads 4–10x faster,reducing the time compute resources are consumed and therefore, significantly lowering costs.
Yeedu also introduces smart scheduling, which dynamically optimizes workload execution based on resource efficiency, queue patterns, and historical trends. Rather than running jobs in a rigid, first-in-first-out manner, Yeedu prioritizes and orchestrates execution inways that deliver maximum output with minimal cloud spend.
The result? Enterprises using Yeedu have seen 50-60% reductions in cloud spend on data processing without compromising on performance, reliability, or integration with existing tools.
With an architecture focused on efficiency and innovations like Turbo Engine and Smart Scheduling, Yeedu empowers engineering and data teams to take control of costs without slowing innovation.
If you're ready to move beyond monitoring and into truly cost-aware data execution,explore more at yeedu.io.
